Research and literature review workspace
Organize one claim per row, then keep sources, methods, findings, limitations, and confidence visible together. Search, filter, import, and export without creating an account.
| Claim or question | Source and year | Method | Finding | Limitation | Strength | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Add a row or load the example to start your matrix. | ||||||
Why use a matrix
A literature review becomes easier to reason about when each source is connected to a specific claim, method, result, and limitation. The matrix makes disagreement and missing evidence visible before they disappear into a paragraph.
Strength labels are intentionally yours to set. The tool organizes evidence without claiming to measure source credibility or replace disciplinary judgment.
A repeatable workflow
Continue on mobile
When your evidence map becomes a draft, use AI Detector on iPhone or Android for file import, image scanning, history, and focused revision.
Frequently asked questions
No. Rows stay in your browser. Export files are created on your device. Only a separate service you choose to use, such as a public DOI lookup, would require a network request.
Use one row for each claim or research question, then record the source, year, method, finding, limitation, and your confidence in the evidence.
Yes. The import panel accepts tab-separated or pipe-separated rows. The first seven columns map to claim, source, year, method, finding, limitation, and strength.
No. Strength is your review label, not an automated credibility verdict. Check the study design, context, sample, limitations, and the source itself.